Why Do You Need a DNP Editor?
As a DNP student, you receive guidance and feedback from experts in advanced practice nursing. Your faculty, committee members, and advisers have achieved the highest levels of nursing credentials.
Most of them are PhDs or DNPs with decades of experience in academia and/or nursing practice. They know their stuff. They know evidence-based practice. They know the nursing literature. |
In other words, you get guidance and feedback from experts in nursing content: They know “what” your project will be about and “what” content should be present somewhere in your proposal in order for it to be acceptable to the IRB.
So why would you need an editor to help you with your DNP project proposal or final paper?
The short answer is, DNP faculty, committee members, and advisers are experts in nursing.
An experienced editor is an expert in how to write, organize, and improve written arguments.
One of the most frequent comments I hear from my nursing students and faculty clients is,
“It was so helpful to have your expert eye review my paper and point out gaps in the argument and content.”
Another is,
“I and my committee were too close to the project to see the flaws; your lack of familiarity with the project really helped us strengthen the paper.”
There’s a huge difference between reviewing a paper for content accuracy and adequacy--which is what your committee and advisers should be doing for you--and reviewing a paper for gaps in logic and argumentation, problems with sentence structure and voice, and other writing issues that render a paper ineffective and unacceptable.
The best possible project, designed with the most care and driven by the latest evidence, will never see the light of day unless the project proposal is written in such a way as to persuade the IRB that it’s necessary, possible, and safe.
The best possible project with the best possible results will never get published unless the project manuscript is written clearly, logically, and convincingly from beginning to end.
If you lack confidence in your ability to edit your own work, rest assured that you can request editing of your publishable manuscript or project proposal today.
So why would you need an editor to help you with your DNP project proposal or final paper?
The short answer is, DNP faculty, committee members, and advisers are experts in nursing.
An experienced editor is an expert in how to write, organize, and improve written arguments.
One of the most frequent comments I hear from my nursing students and faculty clients is,
“It was so helpful to have your expert eye review my paper and point out gaps in the argument and content.”
Another is,
“I and my committee were too close to the project to see the flaws; your lack of familiarity with the project really helped us strengthen the paper.”
There’s a huge difference between reviewing a paper for content accuracy and adequacy--which is what your committee and advisers should be doing for you--and reviewing a paper for gaps in logic and argumentation, problems with sentence structure and voice, and other writing issues that render a paper ineffective and unacceptable.
The best possible project, designed with the most care and driven by the latest evidence, will never see the light of day unless the project proposal is written in such a way as to persuade the IRB that it’s necessary, possible, and safe.
The best possible project with the best possible results will never get published unless the project manuscript is written clearly, logically, and convincingly from beginning to end.
If you lack confidence in your ability to edit your own work, rest assured that you can request editing of your publishable manuscript or project proposal today.